In recent news, Xiaomi Air Purifier has been flagged by the Shanghai Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau for failing to meet quality standards, specifically regarding "clean air performance" and "noise levels." As a result, the official Xiaomi stores on Tmall and JD.com have removed the product from their shelves. This is not the first time Xiaomi has faced scrutiny; since launching its air purifier, it has continuously dealt with issues ranging from accusations of copying designs to concerns over product quality.
According to a report by the *Economic Information Daily*, Beijing Xiaomi Air Purifier Co., Ltd. (Zhi Mi Technology), the manufacturer behind the Xiaomi air purifier, had its original shareholders—originally from Beijing Xiaomi Software Technology Co., Ltd.—changed to two individual shareholders, Su Jun and Liu De, at the beginning of last year. Analysts are now questioning whether this shift affects Xiaomi’s control over its ecosystem companies.
On January 14, the Shanghai Quality Supervision Bureau released the "2015 Shanghai Air Purifier Product Quality Supervision and Spot Check Results," which revealed that 36 batches of air purifiers failed quality tests, including the Xiaomi AC-M1-CA model sold through Jingdong Online Mall. The product was found to have serious quality issues, particularly in terms of clean air output and noise levels. According to the test results, the CADR (Clean Air Delivery Rate) value of the Xiaomi air purifier was reported to be only 346 cubic meters per hour, significantly lower than the claimed 406 cubic meters per hour.
Xiaomi has disputed these findings, stating that the inspection process may have used different testing procedures. They have requested a re-evaluation of the results. Despite this, the product has been taken off the shelves by major online retailers like Tmall and JD.com. However, some third-party sellers on Taobao still offer the product.
The controversy surrounding the Xiaomi air purifier has persisted since its launch. In December 2014, users raised concerns about the device's ability to detect air quality without removing the filter's plastic film, leading to allegations of data manipulation. While Xiaomi responded that the app calculates filter life based on an algorithm, the issue sparked widespread skepticism.
Additionally, reports surfaced in late 2015 about potential leaks from the air purifier's filter, causing dust to spread throughout the room. Xiaomi addressed the issue, claiming it was rare and offering replacements. Earlier, in 2014, Xiaomi faced accusations of copying Balmuda's design, prompting a public response from both companies.
Industry reports also highlight Xiaomi as the top complainant among air purifier brands, with 17% of complaints related to noise, sensor malfunctions, and filter replacement issues. As part of Xiaomi's broader ecosystem strategy, the company aims to invest in over 100 eco-chain businesses. However, questions remain about how effectively these companies maintain quality, especially after recent changes in ownership and leadership.
With the introduction of new independent branding for eco-chain products, the focus now shifts to how Xiaomi ensures consistent quality across its expanding range of smart devices. As the market watches closely, the future of Xiaomi's ecosystem and its commitment to quality will be put to the test.
Guangzhou Yunge Tianhong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd , http://www.e-cigaretteyfactory.com